Looking for:

Movie Studio Platinum 12 – Free download and software reviews – CNET Download

Click here to Download

Movie Studio Platinum is an excellent video-editing tool. It has an astonishing interface, whose all the visual elements have been exactly. As well as the three programs mentioned above, this Suite version also comes bundled with some third party plugins, music samples and tutorials. The Guide to Sony Movie Studio Platinum The tools, and how to use them, to make movies on your personal computer using Sony’s amazing video.


Sony movie studio platinum 12 tutorial free download –


Designed to make shopping easier. IObit Uninstaller. Internet Download Manager. Advanced SystemCare Free. WinRAR bit. VLC Media Player. MacX YouTube Downloader. Microsoft Office YTD Video Downloader. Adobe Photoshop CC. VirtualDJ Avast Free Security. WhatsApp Messenger. Talking Tom Cat. Clash of Clans. Subway Surfers. TubeMate 3. Google Play. Windows Windows. I also want to start doing color correction in DaVincci with bit colour space, so I would like the card to be able to support this.

Looks like the HD would solve the problem, but those are still price. Please comment. The owners of this codec have not updated their code for a long time and I guess they never will. So buying an R will be of little use to you, if you mainly want to use the MC encoder. I am still using an Nvidia GTX in my own computer and use it all the time for rendering to Mainconcept AVC – it works very, very well and definitely renders faster than my over-clocked Intel ik.

There is a wide selection on 2nd hand Nvidia graphics cards for sale on eBay. The main reason why most people are selling their cards on eBay, is because they are probably Gamers and are continually looking for the latest and best GPU.

Thanks for the feedback. Will look for a GTX Plenty on Amazon. Will those also work with the MC codec? Could not find any information online. Those can be had quite cheaply new on Amazon. I rather buy new. Also, assuming that a higher number means a later model and probably some kind of increase in computing power. Anyone who owns a GTX series card and uses Vegas, reports excellent performance. With the release of Nvidia’s GTX series, they ended proper support for Video Editing programs by deliberately crippling the Drivers.

GTX, , Nvidia’s logic is that if you are a Video Editor, you should be using their professional Quadro cards which DO come with excellent Drivers that support Video Editing programs. Big problem with Qaudro is they are terribly over-priced. Moving forward into the future, Sony now works much more closely with AMD Graphics Cards, because they have better drivers for Video Editing generally.

Has anyone verified this? If yes, how significant is change in rendering times? Feedback, please. For rendering Video, it would be best if you use your CPU only. Graphics Card compatibility is a huge topic.

Nvidia is trying to force people to buy expensive Quadro cards for Video Editing. If you ever decide to upgrade your card, get AMD Radeon. I figured as much. Even if it’s a small boost, I could use it. My renders typically run 12 hrs. Below the R9, are there any other Radeon cards that give equivalant or even decent performance at a lower price? Also, does it have to be specifically the AMD version of the card, or will any third party card that uses the AMD chipset will work just as well.

Nvidia is useless now. I would not recommend for anyone. However I always believe it is better to save up for a little extra time and get the best you can afford. I explain what the problem is with Graphics Cards in this article. Scroll to section and the pink section. Thanks for the info. It aligns with whatI have been reading online.

I plan to get MS 13 soon. I want to get a card that good compromise between cost and performance. Although, I could not find the details of the benchmark setup. The Radeon HD series apparently work with both, so it would make sense to get something like the HD, but that is older technology.

I would prefer to get something newer, but don’t want to run the risk of getting a new card that does not support both Main Concepts and Sony AVC. Perhaps you could share your thoughts and experience on this.

The H. The company that owns Mainconcept is responsible for this. They own the code and are not updating how it works with the newest architecture in graphics cards. This is why the older GTX series are so good – they work under all conditions.

You can go round and round in circles with this topic. Everything I know from doing months and months of research is in the article that I told you to read. I have been looking at this for a while too and it is indeed a circuitous problem.

My experience using Platinum 10 is that the Main Concepts codec gives better results smoother video than Sony in certain situations -particularly where there is a lot of movement and things like cobblestone with movement. However, the rendering is way longer and the files are larger.

I don’t know if this has been improved in MS 13 can’t test because it won’t run on my current Win XP setup , but I still have to consider Main Concepts in my final decision. A little bit more research I think answered my questions. Maybe not essential, but definitely useful. Report abuse. This is a fabulous book for anyone wanting to edit video. I have used Sony Vegas and DVD Architect for years but with limited help from the user manual and help menus which seemed to assume that I would know what it meant by “aspect ratio” and other technical terms.

Well now, at last, I do – thanks to Steve Grisetti and Movipix. No prior knowledge is assumed; everything is patiently and clearly explained and I now understand how easy it is to undermine the quality of a finished product, however good the original footage, by choosing the wrong initial settings for a project.

As well as explanations of what each option does, there are also recommendations of which ones to use, which is a vast improvement on the educated guess method of selection that I used to employ!

It has also brought me up to date on handling HD footage and it even has suggested work-arounds for importing seemingly incompatible media. Investing in this book is likely to save many hours of trial and error so, for me, it was well worth every penny.

I found the digital manual provided with the software and the tutorials and online help rather irksome. I am not a novice when it comes to video editing and I have used various packages over the years. This book is thoughtfully put together, readable, easy to follow and contains many useful hints and tips. It is certainly the case that my editing sessions have gone far more smoothly with fewer frustrations since I’ve had this publication at my elbow.

If you’re one of those people who prefers a book to on-screen help this is for you. It’s pitched at a level which will be useful to all but the most adept. One person found this helpful. A really practical useful guide with clear instructions and very helpful screen pictures ; with a plethora of options , menus and dialogue boxes often concealed within the main window layout these pictorials were an absolute boon to a grey hair like me.

See all reviews. Your recently viewed items and featured recommendations. Back to top.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *